Understanding Dialyzer Varieties | FMCNA

Understanding Dialyzer Types | FMCNA
January 29, 2021 0 Comments

For instance, if a dialysis machine generated a transmembrane stress (TMP) of 200 mm Hg, a dialyzer with a Kuf of 12 ml/hr/mm Hg would produce an ultrafiltration fee of 12 ml/hr/mm Hg x 200 mm Hg = 2.4 L/hr.

Kuf is comparatively unimportant in trendy HD machines with volumetric UF management, though dialyzers with a better Kuf could have larger clearance and sieving coefficient values as properly.


Excessive efficiency membrane (HPM) is a classification utilized in Japan to determine hole fiber dialyzers with a complicated stage of efficiency. HPM membranes enhance elimination of protein-bound uremic toxins from albumin leak and likewise enhance elimination of middle- to large-molecular-weight solutes, together with β2-macroglobulin, via elevated diffusion and adsorption. The Japanese Society of Dialysis Remedy (JSDT) recommends that pores in HPM be giant sufficient to permit slight losses of albumin, at a fee of <3 g/session with a blood stream fee of 200 ml/min and a dialysate stream fee of 500 ml/min. The speculation is that bigger pores approximate the glomerular filtration of uremic toxins and albumin within the human kidney, whereas some protein leakage could improve albumin turnover. No scientific outcomes information help this at current.


Diffusive solute elimination by a dialyzer is normally described by way of clearance (Okay), which is outlined as the quantity of blood fully cleared of a given solute per unit time. Not like the in-vitro clearance of a selected solute (KoA), which is equipped by the producer and decided in vitro, Okay relies on each the blood and dialysate stream charges. Because of this, it isn’t a superb technique of characterizing innate dialyzer efficiency. All dialyzers report in-vitro clearance values, and the precise in-vivo clearances are sometimes decrease than the in-vitro values for a similar blood stream fee (Qb) and dialysate stream fee (Qd) mixture.


Kt/Vurea is essentially the most validated and generally measured parameter of dialysis adequacy regardless of its limitations1. Some clinicians use a low-efficiency dialyzer and/or shorter time and low blood and dialysate stream charges in the course of the preliminary hemodialysis therapy(s) to keep away from dialysis disequilibrium syndrome. With a purpose to decide the dialyzer that can present a goal Kt/Vurea  first calculate the entire physique water (TBW = Urea quantity of distribution) both anthropometrically (e.g., Watson for adults, Mellits-Cheek for youngsters) or, ideally, through bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) when out there to unravel the Kt/V equation for both t (period of therapy) or Okay (dialyzer clearance for a given Qb/Qd).

 For instance, Mr. Doe has a V of 40L and the goal Kt/V is 1.4:

                  Kxt/V or Kxt/40 = 1.4

                  Kxt = 40 x 1.4 = 56 L or 56,000 ml

Let’s assume you will have a dialyzer that has in-vitro Okayurea of 250 ml/min at Qb/Qd of 300/500 ml per minute. This clearance must be multiplied by 0.85, which is a few 15% adjustment from in-vitro to in-vivo clearance. Due to this fact, Okay can be 250 x 0.85 = 212.5 ml/min.

The period of therapy, or t, can now be decided:

                  212.5 x t = 56,000

                  t = 56,000/212.5 = 264 minutes (4 hours 24 minutes). This time may be decreased by selecting a much bigger dialyzer or growing Qb and Qd.

Then again, if the period of therapy that you’re going to prescribe (let’s assume 4 hours or 240 minutes), you possibly can clear up for the Okayurea wanted to ship Kt/Vurea of 1.4.

                  Okay x 240 = 56,000

                  Okay = 56,000/240 = 233 ml/min

                  In-vitro to in-vivo conversion = 233/0.85 = 274 ml/min

So, you will have a dialyzer with printed in-vitro urea clearance of 274 ml/min at a Qb/Qd of 300/500 ml/min for this affected person. 

You will need to acknowledge a number of factors about these calculations:

  1. You possibly can have totally different Qb/Qd, akin to 400/600 or 500/800 ml/min, and may use them in these calculations.
  2. Anthropometric TBW calculations overestimate V, due to this fact, the delivered Kt/Vurea could also be larger than the calculated one.
  3. Complete delivered dose could have a contribution from residual kidney operate, which isn’t accounted for in these calculations.
  4. At finest, this calculation gives you with a place to begin, and changes could be wanted based mostly on the measured Kt/Vurea lab values.
  5. At the moment, there isn’t any proof to counsel that adequacy targets must be modified for various etiologies of ESRD, besides in particular circumstances akin to pregnant sufferers who want extra frequent or each day HD with extra adjustment to the dialysate composition given their particular physiological wants.
  6. It will be prudent to keep away from delivering excessive clearances in sufferers with liver failure or others who could also be at larger threat of elevated intracranial stress such mind trauma or surgical procedure.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *