Vitamin D in Continual Kidney Illness and Dialysis Sufferers

Results from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study
March 24, 2021 0 Comments

Vitamins. 2017 Apr; 9(4): 328.


Vitamin D deficiency (<20 ng/mL) and insufficiency (20–29 ng/mL) are widespread amongst sufferers with continual kidney illness (CKD) or present process dialysis. Along with dietary and daylight publicity deficits, components that have an effect on vitamin D deficiency embody race, intercourse, age, weight problems and impaired vitamin D synthesis and metabolism. Serum 1,25(OH)2D ranges additionally lower progressively due to 25(OH)D deficiency, along with impaired availability of 25(OH)D by renal proximal tubular cells, excessive fibroblast development issue (FGF)-23 and decreased purposeful renal tissue. As within the normal inhabitants, this situation is related to elevated morbidity and poor outcomes. Along with the progressive decline of serum calcitriol, vitamin D deficiency results in secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) and its problems, tertiary hyperparathyroidism and hypercalcemia, which require surgical parathyroidectomy or calcimimetics. Kidney Illness Outcomes High quality Initiative (KDOQI) and Kidney Illness Bettering International Outcomes (KDIGO) specialists have acknowledged that vitamin D insufficiency and deficiency needs to be averted in CKD and dialysis sufferers by utilizing supplementation to forestall SHPT. Many vitamin D supplementation regimens utilizing both ergocalciferol or cholecalciferol day by day, weekly or month-to-month have been reported. The advantage of native vitamin D supplementation stays debatable as a result of observational research recommend that vitamin D receptor activator (VDRA) use is related to higher outcomes and it’s extra environment friendly for lowering the serum parathormone (PTH) ranges. Vitamin D has pleiotropic results on the immune, cardiovascular and neurological programs and on antineoplastic exercise. Additional-renal organs possess the enzymatic capability to transform 25(OH)D to 1,25(OH)2D. Regardless of many unanswered questions, a lot information help vitamin D use in renal sufferers. This text emphasizes the position of native vitamin D alternative throughout all-phases of CKD along with VDRA when SHPT persists.

Key phrases: vitamin D, continual kidney illness, dialysis, hyperparathyroidism, vitamin D receptor activators

1. Background

Vitamin D is a fat-soluble secosteroid that has a selected cytosolic receptor. This hormonal system is concerned within the regulation of practically 3% of the human genome. It was first recognized to play a central position in calcium and phosphate metabolism; nevertheless, extra just lately, vitamin D deficiency has been related to quite a few occasions and situations within the normal inhabitants comparable to falls, fractures, diabetes, autoimmune ailments, cardiovascular and renal ailments, tuberculosis, melancholy, neurodegenerative ailments, and most cancers [1,2].

People purchase the vast majority of their vitamin D from sunlight-induced cutaneous synthesis, (approximatively 80%), the remaining comes from weight loss program and complement [1]. Vegetable sources present ergocalciferol (D2) and animal sources present cholecalciferol (D3); each of those have related metabolisms. These precursors are transported within the liver by a vitamin D binding protein (DBP); then, vitamin D is hydroxylated on the C25 place by particular hydroxylase coded by the CYP2R1 gene. 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) is the principle circulating type of vitamin D. It has been thought-about a precursor of the energetic type 1,25(OH)2D, however, at very excessive focus, it has the capability to bind to vitamin D receptor (VDR). Moreover, varied extrarenal cells specific megalin, notably parathyroid cells and osteoblast, and the 1α-hydroxylase [3]. Subsequently, native manufacturing of 1,25(OH2)D occurred in quite a few tissues [4].

Some specialists have outlined vitamin D deficiency as a serum 25(OH)D stage <20 ng/mL and insufficiency as between 21 and 29 ng/mL: a target of >30 ng/mL is usually recommended for optimum well being [1,5,6]. Nonetheless, this stays controversial due to the shortage of a consensus concerning the optimum vary for serum 25(OH)D [7,8]. Nonetheless, there’s a widespread understanding that low serum 25(OH)D ranges trigger a unfavorable calcium stability, secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT), and bone illness.

Few meals include ample vitamin D. Subsequently, with out day by day daylight publicity or fortified meals, an necessary threat for vitamin D deficiency exists. Thus, local weather, location, getting older, way of life, and pores and skin pigmentation have an effect on vitamin D manufacturing.

The Workshop Consensus for Vitamin D Dietary Tips estimated that greater than 50% of the older inhabitants are vitamin D-deficient or vitamin D-insufficient [9]. The identical is true for youthful populations, even in sunny international locations [10]. Subsequently, multiple billion individuals are thought to have vitamin D insufficiency or deficiency worldwide.

In continual kidney illness (CKD), the hyperphosphaturic osteocyte-derived hormone FGF-23 will increase to compensate for phosphate retention and additional inhibits renal 1α-hydroxylase expression, and induces the expression of 24-hydroxylase liable for the degradation of 1,25-(OH2)D. Nonetheless, 24,25(OH)D ranges are decrease in dialysis sufferers than within the regular inhabitants. Thus, the impaired uptake of 25(OH)D by altered kidneys stays the principle reason behind 1,25(OH2)D deficiency [11] because the metabolic clearance price of calcitriol appears not altered [12]. Along with the direct impact of excessive 25(OH)D ranges, native osteoblastic conversion of 25(OH)D to 1,25(OH2)D seems to be an necessary optimistic regulator of FGF-23 manufacturing, notably in uremia [13].

Along with decreased kidney operate, a lower in 1,25(OH)2D results in hypocalcemia and SHPT, that are the principle causes of secondary osteoporosis.

The chance for falls and fracture is 4 occasions higher for feminine dialysis sufferers in contrast with the final inhabitants [14], and this might justify prevention methods. Proof for the usefulness of vitamin D to deal with renal bone illness is now practically six many years previous. Nonetheless, the routine use of vitamin D for stopping or reversing the impression of SHPT on the bones of sufferers with CKD has been carried out in common medical follow for less than three many years. In the course of the preliminary years of dialysis use, native vitamin D compounds (calciferol and calcidiol) have been prescribed [15]. Within the Nineteen Eighties, energetic vitamin D compounds have been recognized and have been used as a substitute [16]. This transition may very well be defined by the truth that it was assumed that 25(OH)D couldn’t be metabolized to 1,25(OH)2D by the kidneys. Nonetheless, the pharmacological impacts of various vitamin D species and of their totally different modes of administration can’t be assumed to be uniform throughout the spectrum.

Each the Kidney Illness Outcomes High quality Initiative (KDOQI) [5] and Kidney Illness Bettering International Outcomes (KDIGO) [17] specialists advocate checking and supplementing low serum 25(OH)D ranges in CKD and dialysis sufferers.

The intention of this evaluation was to supply the present precise data and to handle the questions nephrologists might have concerning vitamin D in CKD and dialysis sufferers.

2. Why Are Low Serum 25(OH)D Ranges Typically Noticed in CKD and Dialysis Sufferers?

CKD represents one of many essential situations related to low 25(OH)D serum ranges. Research of transplant recipients confirmed a excessive frequency of vitamin D insufficiency (>80% of circumstances) [18]. The identical is true for CKD non-transplant sufferers, with >80% having low serum 25(OH)D ranges [19]. Observational research reported progressive vitamin D deficiency worsening from stage 3 to stage 5D [20]. Nonetheless, in a cross-sectional research, Guesseous et al. reported that vitamin D deficiency is equally noticed in CKD sufferers and within the normal inhabitants [21]. The principle causes and threat components for vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency are displayed in . As well as, age and feminine intercourse, proteinuria, low bodily exercise [22], diabetes [23], and physique adiposity [24] are related to vitamin D deficiency in CKD sufferers. Cankaya et al. reported that serum vitamin D stage is decrease in peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD) sufferers in contrast with CKD and renal transplant sufferers [25].

Desk 1

Causes and threat components for 25(OH)D deficiency or insufficiency in CKD and dialysis sufferers.

  • Age [22], feminine intercourse [18,23], adiposity [24]

  • Proteinuria [22]

  • Low bodily exercise [22]

  • Peritoneal dialysis [25]

  • Diabetes mellitus [23]

  • Diminished VDR [26]

  • Impaired 25(OH)D tubular reabsorption [27]

  • Diminished pores and skin synthesis of vitamin D [28]

  • Calcineurin inhibitor prescriptions [18]

  • Discount of the liver CYP450 isoform in SHPT [29]

Jacob et al. reported that continual hemodialysis sufferers exhibit faulty photoproduction of cholecalciferol, regardless of regular epidermal content material of substrate, 7-dehydrocholesterol [28].

In transplant recipients, the identical components are discovered along with the danger recognized when prescribing calcineurin inhibitors remedies [18].

VDR ranges are decreased and CYP24A1 is elevated in CKD sufferers [26]. As well as, vitamin D binding protein (VDBP) appears to extend and isn’t concerned in 25(OH)D deficiency in CKD sufferers [30]. Takemoto et al. reported that 25(OH)D tubular reabsorption is impaired as a consequence of decreased renal megalin [27]. As a compensatory mechanism, vitamin D catabolism, measured by 24,25(OH)2D, is decreased in CKD sufferers and particularly in dialysis sufferers [31]. Michaud et al. prompt that uremia decreases 25(OH)D synthesis secondary to PTH-mediated discount in liver CYP450 isoforms [29]. Subsequently, it may very well be speculated a vicious cycle involving vitamin D and SHPT that requires progressive quantities of vitamin D compounds to be reversed.

3. Penalties of Low Serum 25(OH)D Ranges in CKD and Dialysis Sufferers

The associations between vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency and signs or outcomes are reported in .

Desk 2

Affiliation between vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency and outcomes for CKD and Dialysis populations.

  • Secondary HPT [32] and excessive bone turnover markers [33]

  • Low bone mineral density [32,34]

  • Muscle weak point [35] and threat of falls [36]

  • Metabolic syndrome and weight problems [37], insulin resistance [38]

  • Left ventricular hypertrophy and atherosclerosis [38]

  • Vascular calcification [39,40] and arterial stiffness [41]

  • Cognitive impairment [42]

  • Development of kidney illness [43]

  • Mortality [43,44,45]

Low 25(OH)D has been related to excessive bone turnover, SHPT, and decreased bone mineral density (BMD) in CKD and dialysis sufferers [32,33,34]. Low 25(OH)D has been related to muscle weak point [35] and threat of falls [36]. Boudville et al. reported that 25(OH)D deficiency is related to muscular weak point and falls in dialysis sufferers, however with a J curve and maximal profit within the vary between 24 and 44 ng/mL of serum 25(OH)D ranges [36]. Vitamin D deficiency has been related to metabolic syndrome and weight problems [37] in HD sufferers. In PD sufferers, low vitamin D ranges have been related to cognitive impairment [42]. In transplant recipients, low serum 25(OH)D stage is related to a fast decline in renal operate [46,47]. Vitamin D deficiency has been related to insulin resistance, ventricular hypertrophy, atherosclerotic illness [38], and vascular calcifications [39]. London et al. reported an inverse relationship between arterial stiffness and serum 25(OH)D and 1,25(OH)2D ranges in dialysis sufferers [41]. Ravani et al. reported that serum 25(OH)D ranges <15 ng/mL are related to each the danger for mortality and development to dialysis in predialysis CKD sufferers [43]. A resistance to vitamin D3 has been reported in CKD and is related to development of renal illness [48]. Apart from, the defects in calcitriol upregulation of renal Klotho expression might play a task within the development of renal injury and heart problems in CKD sufferers [49,50].

The renal protecting impact of vitamin D has been linked with inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system and NF-κB pathway [51] and upregulation of nitric oxide synthase transcription in vascular endothelial cells [52].

In a meta-analysis [44], Pilz et al. reported that 10 ng/mL greater 25(OH)D stage was related to a lower of 14% in mortality threat. The prognosis of CKD sufferers appears to enhance with vitamin D supplementation [53]. Low 1,25(OH)2D [54] and low 25(OH)D [45] have been related to mortality in dialysis sufferers. In some dialysis cohorts, a transparent affiliation between low serum 25(OH)D ranges and mortality has been reported. For instance, in a French cohort, mortality threat was elevated by 30% when the serum 25(OH)D stage was <18 ng/mL [45]. Nonetheless, the connection between outcomes and serum 25(OH)D stage needs to be interpreted along with serum PTH and FGF-23 [55].

4. How Can Vitamin D Deficiency and Insufficiency Be Supplemented?

Due to the lengthy lifetime of complicated 25(OH)D and DBP (480 h), day by day (1000 U D3), weekly [56] or month-to-month (40,000 U D3) [57] regimens appear environment friendly for restoring 25(OH)D ranges [58]. For years, we selected to supply month-to-month cholecalciferol throughout dialysis to insure observance [59]. Zitt et al. reported {that a} weekly dosing routine of 100 U/kg physique weight for dialysis sufferers permits achievement of goal serum 25(OH)D stage in solely 27% of circumstances [60]. Vitamin D offered throughout dialysis is more practical than residence prescriptions [61]. Calcifediol is usually prescribed as day by day, biweekly, or month-to-month vitamin D supplementation with the identical effectivity [62]. In France, nephrologists used to prescribe cholecalciferol as oral 100,000 IU month-to-month doses, which permit normalization of serum 25(OH)D stage in >85% of circumstances [59]. In Belgium, Delanaye et al. reported their expertise utilizing oral cholecalciferol 25,000 IU each two weeks, which allowed achievement of the beneficial targets of >30 ng/mL after 12 months [63].

In CKD non-dialysis sufferers, this isn’t normally crucial, as in accordance with our expertise, 50,000 IU of cholecalciferol month-to-month is ample most often.

Although these protocols demonstrated their effectivity, security and ease, others can be utilized after validation with serum 25(OH)D, PTH, calcium, and phosphate ranges.

Protocols utilizing initially excessive loading doses and subsequent low dose displayed much less effectivity and the danger for over dosing throughout the first weeks and below dosing thereafter has been reported [64,65].

It should be famous that the pharmaceutical vitamin D3 dosages which can be accessible significantly differ from one nation to a different. In France, solely drops (300 IU/drop) or calcium + vitamin D3 mixtures can be found for day by day supplementation, whereas 80,000, 100,000 and 200,000 IU vials can be found as spaced-out doses. That is the explanation why month-to-month doses are most frequently prescribed in France. Nonetheless, a current meta-analysis of randomized managed trials (RCTs) has proven that day by day (or weekly) vitamin D3 doses are extra environment friendly to cut back acute respiratory tract infections than month-to-month doses [66]. A number of vitamin D specialists have offered the reason why day by day dosing is a lot better than bolus dosing [67,68], explaining why most of the trials that used bolus doses resulted in unfavorable findings. Moreover, whereas day by day doses of 700–1000 IU/day cut back the danger of falls [69] and fractures [70] within the aged, it was present in a RCT revealed in 2010 that aged girls who obtained a really giant annual dose of 500,000 IU had extra falls than those that obtained the placebo [71]. Just lately, Bischoff-Ferrari et al. have proven in a RCT that frail aged sufferers who obtained month-to-month doses of 60,000 IU (equal to 2000 IU/day) throughout one 12 months sustained considerably extra falls than different sufferers who have been randomized to 24,000 IU monthly (equal to 800 IU/day) [72]. As the identical authors beforehand discovered no distinction when it comes to falls between girls who obtained 800 IU/day or 2000 IU/day [73], their current outcomes recommend that greater month-to-month doses are extra deleterious than useful for the danger of falls in comparison with reasonable ones. Though such information don’t exist in CKD sufferers handled or not handled by continual dialysis, we take the above-mentioned outcomes under consideration and we count on that day by day vitamin D3 doses which can be extra appropriate for medical use than these presently accessible will likely be launched in France within the close to future.

5. Impact of Native Vitamin D Supplementation on CKD and Dialysis Sufferers

The principle reported results of vitamin D supplementation are displayed in . These results rely upon the vitamin D dosage, the kind of vitamin D compounds, the period of the research, and the studied inhabitants. One of many essential anticipated results is the decreasing of serum PTH stage. Therefore, the outcomes should not all the time optimistic. In a meta-analysis, Kandula et al. reported that dietary vitamin D results in elevated 25(OH)D ranges (imply + 24 ng/mL) with none hypercalcemia or hyperphosphatemia and with a lower in serum PTH stage (41% lower), largely in dialysis sufferers [74]. The imply dosage was 50,000 IU weekly throughout the first month; a decrease dosage was used thereafter. Cupisti et al. and Alvarez et al. [75] reported mildly decreased serum PTH ranges after vitamin D supplementation [76]. We’ve reported a lower in SHPT in dialysis sufferers after systematic vitamin D supplementation throughout the predialysis interval [77]. Novel modified-release calcifediol appears to have important efficacy in lowering PTH in CKD sufferers [78]. A current randomized managed trial (RCT) assessing short-term results of ergocalciferol, weekly or month-to-month, throughout three months, didn’t discover a important impact on PTH stage [79]. Nonetheless, evaluating the totally different revealed regimens, Tangpricha et al. prompt that inadequate dosages (i.e., <100,000 U/month) might not be ample to realize enough replenishment, elevated 1,25(OH)2D and decreased PTH [80]. We have to decide the dose vary for responsiveness utilizing ergocalciferol or cholecalciferol and totally different protocols (day by day, weekly, or month-to-month administration). Nonetheless, as a consequence of its shorter excessive life, ergocalciferol shouldn’t be prescribed on a month-to-month routine. Massart et al. [56] and we [59] reported elevated serum 1,25(OH)2D stage after cholecalciferol supplementation. Seibeirt et al. confirmed these information and moreover didn’t discover a rise in FGF-23 focus after vitamin D supplementation [81].

Desk 3

Reported results of vitamin D supplementation on CKD and dialysis sufferers.

  • Serum PTH stage lower [74,75,76,78]

  • Serum 1,25(OH)2D stage enhance [56,59,81]

  • Diminished proteinuria [82]

  • Endothelial cardiovascular markers enchancment [83]

  • Irritation markers lower [84]

Aytac et al. reported a good impact of high-dose cholecalciferol on cardiovascular and endothelial parameters of youngsters with CKD [83] by utilizing flow-mediated dilatation, arterial stiffness, homocysteine, and von Willebrand issue measurements. Karakas et al. confirmed that eight weeks of cholecalciferol improved the share of flow-mediated dilatation in dialysis with CKD sufferers [85]. In diabetic non-dialyzed sufferers utilizing angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, a lower in proteinuria by including native vitamin D was discovered by Kim et al. [82]. Meireless et al. reported in a RCT that cholecalciferol (50,000 twice weekly) promoted upregulation of CYP27B1 and VDR expression in monocytes and decreased serum IL-6 and C-reactive protein ranges [84]. In a current meta-analysis, Mann et al. reported an absence of serious results of vitamin D supplementation on mortality [86].

Outcomes of vitamin D trials differ for the final inhabitants and renal sufferers. The discrepancies could also be as a consequence of variations in baseline serum 25(OH)D ranges, vitamin D doses and remedy intervals, adherence to supplementation, and VDR genetic polymorphisms [87].

6. Vitamin D Toxicity?

Reverse to vitamin D receptor activator (VDRA), dietary vitamin D compounds are unlikely to induce hypercalcemia utilizing a standard routine as a result of its 1α-hydroxylase activation is regulated by PTH, FGF-23 and 24-hydroxylase.Subsequently, a serum 25(OH)D stage as much as 100 ng/mL is taken into account protected [1]. Within the normal inhabitants, day by day vitamin D intakes >10,000 IU could also be poisonous as a result of they result in DBP saturation with a rise of free serum 25(OH)D [88]. As well as, toxicity has been noticed for greater dosages (>40,000 U/day) [89]. Jacobus et al. reported eight circumstances of vitamin D intoxication that seem to have been brought on by extreme vitamin D fortification of dairy milk with serum 25(OH)D >300 ng/mL [90].

Vitamin D toxicity is elevated by greater calcium consumption, calcitriol analogs, and adynamic bone illness in dialysis sufferers. The frequency of this toxicity is just not recognized however seems very uncommon. Analysis primarily consists of hypercalcemia with the danger for extraosseous calcification. Hypercalciuria is just not steadily noticed as a result of calciuria could be very low in CKD and dialysis sufferers. The native vitamin D compounds’ half-life could be very lengthy, approximatively two weeks, and toxicity needs to be handled for weeks. The physiopathology of hypercalcemia consists of greater 1,25(OH)2D synthesis, greater intestinal absorption of calcium, and better calcium launch from bone. Shut organic monitoring (serum PTH, calcium and phosphate ranges), at the least in dialysis sufferers, might stop vitamin D toxicity.

7. Vitamin D2 or D3?

In 2008, Cavalier et al. reported some issues with 25(OH)D assays when measuring 25(OH)D2 [91]. These issues at the moment are solved. Armas et al. reported that ergocalciferol shows a shorter half-life and is much less potent in contrast with cholecalciferol with the identical preliminary peak, however the serum 25(OH)D plateau decreased rapidly after a couple of days utilizing D2 and lasting 14 days utilizing D3 [92]. Holick et al. confirmed that D2 and D3, given as day by day doses, show the identical effectivity in growing serum 25(OH)D ranges [93]. Nonetheless, Oliveri et al., utilizing the identical loading and day by day dose, report a superiority for D3 compounds [94].

Extra just lately, Wetmore et al. reported that remedy with cholecalciferol, in contrast with ergocalciferol, is more practical at elevating serum 25(OH)D in non-dialysis-dependent CKD sufferers utilizing the identical dosage (50,000 IU weekly) [95]. Lehmann et al. reported that vitamin D3 will increase the whole 25(OH)D focus greater than vitamin D2 and vitamin D2 supplementation was related to a lower in 25(OH)D3, which may clarify the totally different impact on complete 25(OH)D [96].

Ergocalciferol is usually utilized in america. In different international locations, comparable to France, cholecalciferol is the usual type, at the least for CKD sufferers. For dialysis sufferers, we presently use 100,000 IU of oral cholecalciferol month-to-month.

8. VDRA for CKD and Dialysis Sufferers

As reported because the Nineteen Seventies and largely the Nineteen Eighties, calcitriol is environment friendly for treating SHPT with a 50% lower in baseline serum PTH values [16,97]. Although cinacalcet is a generally used remedy for resistant SHPT, calcitriol and analogs (that are VDRAs) stay the first-line remedy. VDRAs are very environment friendly in lowering serum PTH stage, however might result in adynamic bone illness and dangers for toxicity and hypercalcemia, as reported initially when the goal serum PTH worth was decrease [16,97]. Toxicity threat is elevated by greater dosages, concomitant prescriptions of oral calcium, excessive dialysate calcium concentrations (>1.5 mmol/L), and native vitamin D. Adynamic bone illness is suspected with low serum bone marker ranges (bone-specific alkaline phosphatase). The implications of hypercalcemia are well-known and associated to its mobile toxicity. This might justify shut organic monitoring, particularly when prescribing greater dosages. Nonetheless, hypercalcemia and hyperphosphatemia are much less frequent than within the Nineteen Eighties as a result of the serum PTH goal has elevated, from a standard worth to 2 to 9 occasions the higher restrict of the assay, main to cut back the VDRAs dosage. Potential interpretation of serum PTH evolution is just not simple, as when prescribing calcimimetics, and bone marker evolution might assist with therapeutic adjustment.

It has been reported that oral bolus administration of VDRA 3 times weekly was extra environment friendly than the intravenous route [98]. The intravenous route is rather more costly and needs to be used solely when the oral route is just not appropriate, comparable to within the case of gastrointestinal malabsorption. Administration of calcitriol or analogs may very well be carried out day by day or utilizing a bolus. It’s most frequently administered 3 times weekly after dialysis. In France, the imply weekly dosage is <3 μg of alfacalcidol, which is equal to 1.5 μg of calcitriol.

VDRAs are clearly complementary with calcimimetics remedy to forestall hypocalcemia and enhance PTH decreasing [99]. The preliminary selection between these two therapies relies upon primarily on calcemia. When hypercalcemia happens, tertiary HPT is suspected and calcimimetics may very well be the preliminary selection. In different circumstances, VDRAs may very well be the primary selection for treating SHPT. In some giant cohorts, primarily in america, it has been proven that dialysis sufferers handled with VDRAs displayed higher outcomes [100,101,102,103]. A meta-analysis reported higher survival for each CKD and dialysis sufferers handled with VDRAs [104].

A non-randomized potential research carried out in Japan reported decrease mortality charges for dialysis sufferers handled with alfacalcidol [105]. We reported the identical survival benefit in a French cohort of dialysis sufferers handled with alfacalcidol [45]. We have no idea if this survival benefit is said to greater serum 1,25(OH)2D ranges. In the intervening time, no interventional research confirmed any survival benefit for CKD and dialysis sufferers utilizing native vitamin D supplementation. Tanaka et al. reported that infection-related mortality in Japan is decreased in sufferers receiving VDRA largely intravenously [106]. In a current meta-analysis of CKD, Li et al. reported that VDRAs decreased the incidence of cardiovascular occasions and decreased proteinuria, however resulted in an elevated likelihood of hypercalcemia when paricalcitol was used [107]. In an observational research carried out in Japan, it was reported that VDRA prescriptions throughout the late phases of CKD are related to fewer cardiovascular ailments throughout the early dialysis stage [108]. Survival evaluation in some observational cohorts from North America present benefits for sufferers handled with an artificial analog (Paricalcitol), which is regarded as much less hypercalcemic than calcitriol [100,102]. Nonetheless, throughout remedy of SHPT, organic penalties, hypercalcemia and hyperphosphatemia weren’t totally different between paricalcitol and alfacalcidol [109]. Low-dose cholecalciferol in vitamin D-deficient HD sufferers and paricalcitol in circumstances of persistent SHPT have been reported to be environment friendly and to haven’t any unwanted effects [110].

Lou et al. reported a synergistic in vitro impact of 25(OH)D3 with 1α,25(OH2)D3 in Cyp27b1(−/−) cells that demonstrates the agonistic motion of 25(OH)D3 of VDR [111].

In a current research, in rat with SHPT, the correction of vitamin D deficiency successfully reversed the resistance to paricalcitol induction of CCAAT/Enhancer-binding-protein β (C/EBP-β) to suppress ADAM metallopeptidase area 17 expression (additionally referred to as tumor necrosis factor-α-converting enzyme) and parathyroid gland enlargement, decreasing PTH by 50% [112].

Agarwal et al. advocate prescribing solely VDRA as a result of dietary vitamin D didn’t deal with SHPT or enhance outcomes [113]. Zoccali et al. just lately beneficial that native compounds shouldn’t be prescribed to CKD sufferers handled with VDRA as a result of there isn’t any proof indicating that native vitamin D has no organic impact past the calcitriol metabolite [114].

Nonetheless, the correction of calcitriol deficiency to right SHPT with VDRA doesn’t right dietary vitamin D deficiency and all of the well being advantages of regular vitamin D standing, unrelated to a calcitriol standing, is not going to be offered.

9. Our Foremost Message

We expect that native vitamin D supplementation needs to be the primary line of remedy for SHPT prevention. The principle causes are summarized in , however as soon as SHPT or tertiary hyperparathyroidism (HPT) is noticed, including VDRA and/or calcimimetics is justified. Nonetheless, unanswered questions nonetheless exist ().

Desk 4

Why use dietary supplements for vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency for CKD and dialysis sufferers?

  • Low serum 25(OH)D stage is reported in approximatively 90% of CKD and dialysis sufferers

  • 25(OH)D is the gas for endocrine renal and mobile 1,25(OH)2D synthesis

  • 25(OH)D interacts with VDR in varied goal organs

  • Low vitamin D standing results in SHPT

  • 25(OH)D deficiency and insufficiency are related to development of renal illness, morbidity and mortality in CKD and dialysis sufferers

  • Dietary compounds are cheap, not dangerous, and are efficient for stopping SHPT

  • Pleiotropic results comparable to enhancements in proteinuria and heart problems have been reported

Desk 5

  • What’s the optimum serum 25(OH)D goal stage in accordance with totally different CKD phases and severity of SHPT?

  • Ought to we complement sufferers with low serum PTH stage?

  • What’s the optimum 25(OH)D stage for various outcomes (proteinuria, fractures, most cancers, cardiovascular and immune illness . . .)?

  • Is it crucial to keep up native vitamin D dietary supplements in sufferers handled with VDRAs?

  • Apart from hypercalcemia, is there long-term toxicity related to sustaining excessive serum 25(OH)D ranges?

  • Are day by day vitamin D doses higher than weekly or month-to-month bolus doses?

10. Conclusions

Vitamin D insufficiency, which includes each serum 25(OH)D and 1,25(OH)D ranges, is usually noticed in CKD and dialysis sufferers. The principle consequence is SHPT, and vitamin D compounds stay the first-line remedy for its prevention and remedy.

Morbidity and mortality charges are related to 25(OH)D insufficiency in CKD sufferers, however solely VDRAs have been related to higher outcomes in giant observational cohorts. Some questions stay unanswered about indication for serum vitamin D (25(OH)D and 1,25(OH)2D) measurements and about the actual impression of those therapies on outcomes.

Nonetheless, based mostly on the current revealed information, it seems justified to complement CKD sufferers with 25(OH)D insufficiency and to make use of VDRAs for SHPT and hypocalcemia remedy. Eventually, giant RCTs with clinically significant endpoints (fracture, hospitalization, parathyroidectomy, demise) are nonetheless required to evaluate the usefulness of various vitamin D compounds for CKD and dialysis sufferers.

Writer Contributions

Guillaume Jean has written the manuscript with the contribution of Jean-Claude Souberbielle. He has answered many of the points raised by the reviewers. Jean-Claude Souberbielle actively contributed to reply the reviewers’ feedback and questions. Charles Chazot has revised the manuscript and corrected the proofs.

Conflicts of Curiosity

Guillaume Jean has obtained honoraria from Fresenius Medical Care; Jean Claude Souberbielle studies lecture charges and/or journey/resort bills from DiaSorin, Roche Diagnostics, Abbott, Amgen, Shire, MSD, Lilly, and MEDA. Charles Chazot is a Fresenius Medical Care worker. The authors declare no battle of curiosity.


2. Plum L.A., DeLuca H.F. Vitamin D, illness and therapeutic alternatives. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2010;9:941–955. doi: 10.1038/nrd3318. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
3. Townsend Okay., Evans Okay.N., Campbell M.J., Colston Okay.W., Adams J.S., Hewison M. Organic actions of extra-renal 25-hydroxyvitamin D-1alpha-hydroxylase and implications for chemoprevention and remedy. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2005;97:103–109. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2005.06.004. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
4. Dusso A.S., Tokumoto M. Faulty renal upkeep of the vitamin D endocrine system impairs vitamin D renoprotection: A downward spiral in kidney illness. Kidney Int. 2011;79:715–729. doi: 10.1038/ki.2010.543. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
5. Eknoyan G., Levin A., Levin N.W. Bone metabolism and illness in continual kidney illness. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2003;42:S1–S201. doi: 10.1016/S0272-6386(03)00905-3. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
6. Souberbielle J.C., Physique J.J., Lappe J.M., Plebani M., Shoenfeld Y., Wang T.J., Bischoff-Ferrari H.A., Cavalier E., Ebeling P.R., Fardellone P., et al. Vitamin D and musculoskeletal well being, heart problems, autoimmunity and most cancers: Suggestions for medical follow. Autoimmun Rev. 2010;9:709–715. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2010.06.009. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
7. Manson J.E., Brannon P.M., Rosen C.J., Taylor C.L. Vitamin D Deficiency—Is There Actually a Pandemic? N. Engl. J. Med. 2016;375:1817–1820. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1608005. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
8. Holick M.F., Binkley N.C., Bischoff-Ferrari H.A., Gordon C.M., Hanley D.A., Heaney R.P., Murad M.H., Weaver C.M. Endocrine Society. Analysis, remedy, and prevention of vitamin D deficiency: An Endocrine Society medical follow guideline. J. Clini. Endocrinol. Metab. 2011;96:1911–1930. doi: 10.1210/jc.2011-0385. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
9. Henry H.L., Bouillon R., Norman A.W., Gallagher J.C., Lips P., Heaney R.P., Vieth R., Pettifor J.M., Dawson-Hughes B., Lamberg-Allardt C.J., et al. 14th Vitamin D Workshop consensus on vitamin D dietary tips. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2010;121:4–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2010.05.008. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
10. Kumar J., Muntner P., Kaskel F.J., Hailpern S.M., Melamed M.L. Prevalence and associations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D deficiency in US kids: NHANES 2001–2004. Pediatrics. 2009;124:e362–e370. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-0051. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
11. Ishimura E., Nishizawa Y., Inaba M., Matsumoto N., Emoto M., Kawagishi T., Shoji S., Okuno S., Kim M., Miki T., et al. Serum ranges of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D, 24,25-dihydroxyvitamin D, and 25-hydroxyvitamin D in nondialyzed sufferers with continual renal failure. Kidney Int. 1999;55:1019–1027. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.1999.0550031019.x. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
12. Dusso A., Lopez-Hilker S., Lewis-Finch J., Grooms P., Brown A., Martin Okay., Slatopolsky E. Metabolic clearance price and manufacturing price of calcitriol in uremia. Kidney Int. 1989;35:860–864. doi: 10.1038/ki.1989.64. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
13. Nguyen-Yamamoto L., Karaplis A.C., St-Arnaud R., Goltzman D. Fibroblast Development Issue 23 Regulation by Systemic and Native Osteoblast-Synthesized 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2017;28:586–597. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2016010066. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
14. Alem A.M., Sherrard D.J., Gillen D.L., Weiss N.S., Beresford S.A., Heckbert S.R., Wong C., Stehman-Breen C. Elevated threat of hip fracture amongst sufferers with end-stage renal illness. Kidney Int. 2000;58:396–399. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00178.x. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
15. Kaye M., Chatterjee G., Cohen G.F., Borra S., Sagar S. Arrest of hyperparathyroid bone illness by way of dihydrotachysterol in sufferers present process continual hemodialysis. Trans. Assoc. Am. Phys. 1970;83:245–253. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
16. Slatopolsky E., Weerts C., Thielan J., Horst R., Harter H., Martin Okay.J. Marked suppression of secondary hyperparathyroidism by intravenous administration of 1,25-dihydroxy-cholecalciferol in uremic sufferers. J. Clin. Investig. 1984;74:2136–2143. doi: 10.1172/JCI111639. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
17. Kidney Illness: Bettering International Outcomes (KDIGO) CKD-MBD Work Group KDIGO Scientific follow guideline for the prognosis, analysis, prevention, and remedy of Continual Kidney Illness-Mineral and Bone dysfunction (CKD-MBD) Kidney Int. 2009;76(Suppl. S113):S1–S130. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
18. Filipov J.J., Zlatkov B.Okay., Dimitrov E.P., Svinarov D. Relationship between vitamin D standing and immunosuppressive remedy in kidney transplant recipients. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 2015;29:331–335. doi: 10.1080/13102818.2014.995415. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
19. Ngai M., Lin V., Wong H.C., Vathsala A., How P. Vitamin D standing and its affiliation with mineral and bone dysfunction in a multi-ethnic continual kidney illness inhabitants. Clin. Nephrol. 2014;82:231–239. doi: 10.5414/CN108182. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
20. Kim S.M., Choi H.J., Lee J.P., Kim D.Okay., Oh Y.Okay., Kim Y.S., Lim C.S. Prevalence of vitamin D deficiency and results of supplementation with cholecalciferol in sufferers with continual kidney illness. J. Ren. Nutr. 2014;24:20–25. doi: 10.1053/j.jrn.2013.07.003. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
21. Guessous I., McClellan W., Kleinbaum D., Vaccarino V., Zoller O., Theler J.M., Paccaud F., Burnier M., Bochud M. Comparisons of serum vitamin D ranges, standing, and determinants in populations with and with out continual kidney illness not requiring renal dialysis: A 24-h urine assortment population-based research. J. Ren. Nutr. 2014;24:303–312. doi: 10.1053/j.jrn.2014.04.005. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
22. Caravaca-Fontan F., Gonzales-Candia B., Luna E., Caravaca F. Relative significance of the determinants of serum ranges of 25-hydroxy vitamin D in sufferers with continual kidney illness. Nefrologia. 2016;36:510–516. doi: 10.1016/j.nefroe.2016.11.010. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
23. Mohiuddin S.A., Marie M., Ashraf M., Hussein M., Almalki N. Is there an affiliation between Vitamin D stage and inflammatory markers in hemodialysis sufferers? A cross-sectional research. Saudi J. Kidney Dis. Transpl. 2016;27:460–466. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
24. Silva M.I.B., Cavalieri V.V., Lemos C.C., Klein M.R., Bregman R. Physique adiposity predictors of vitamin D standing in nondialyzed sufferers with continual kidney illness: A cross-sectional evaluation in a tropical local weather metropolis. Vitamin. 2017;33:240–247. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2016.06.012. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
25. Cankaya E., Bilen Y., Keles M., Uyanik A., Akbas M., Gungor A., Arslan S., Aydinli B. Comparability of Serum Vitamin D Ranges Amongst Sufferers With Continual Kidney Illness, Sufferers in Dialysis, and Renal Transplant Sufferers. Transpl. Proc. 2015;47:1405–1407. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.04.036. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
26. Ye J.J., Zhou T.B., Zhang Y.F., Wang Q., Su Y.Y., Tang J.M., Li H.Y. Ranges of vitamin D receptor and CYP24A1 in sufferers with end-stage renal illness. Afr. Well being Sci. 2016;16:462–467. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v16i2.14. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
27. Takemoto F., Shinki T., Yokoyama Okay., Inokami T., Hara S., Yamada A., Kurokawa Okay., Uchida S. Gene expression of vitamin D hydroxylase and megalin within the remnant kidney of nephrectomized rats. Kidney Int. 2003;64:414–420. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00114.x. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
28. Jacob A.I., Sallman A., Santiz Z., Hollis B.W. Faulty photoproduction of cholecalciferol in regular and uremic people. J. Nutr. 1984;114:1313–1319. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
29. Michaud J., Naud J., Ouimet D., Demers C., Petit J.L., Leblond F.A., et al. Diminished hepatic synthesis of calcidiol in uremia. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2010;21:1488–1497. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2009080815. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
30. Kalousova M., Dusilova-Sulkova S., Zakiyanov O., Kostirova M., Safranek R., Tesar V., Zima T. Vitamin D Binding Protein Is Not Concerned in Vitamin D Deficiency in Sufferers with Continual Kidney Illness. Biomed. Res. Int. 2015;2015:492365. doi: 10.1155/2015/492365. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
31. De Boer I.H., Sachs M.C., Chonchol M., Himmelfarb J., Hoofnagle A.N., Ix J.H., Kremsdorf R.A., Lin Y.S., Mehrotra R., Robinson-Cohen C., et al. Estimated GFR and circulating 24,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 focus: A participant-level evaluation of 5 cohort research and medical trials. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2014;64:187–197. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.02.015. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
32. Mucsi I., Almasi C., Deak G., Marton A., Ambrus C., Berta Okay., Bonnardeaux A., Gascon-Barre M., Pichette V. Serum 25(OH)-vitamin D ranges and bone metabolism in sufferers on upkeep hemodialysis. Clin. Nephrol. 2005;64:288–294. doi: 10.5414/CNP64288. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
33. Milinkovic N., Majkic-Singh N.T., Mirkovic D.D., Beletic A.D., Pejanovic S.D., Vujanic S.T. Relation between 25(OH)-vitamin D deficiency and markers of bone formation and resorption in haemodialysis sufferers. Clin. Lab. 2009;55:333–339. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
34. Lee Y.H., Kim J.E., Roh Y.H., Choi H.R., Rhee Y., Kang D.R., Lim S.Okay. The mix of vitamin D deficiency and delicate to reasonable continual kidney illness is related to low bone mineral density and deteriorated femoral microarchitecture: Outcomes from the KNHANES 2008-2011. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2014;99:3879–3888. doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-3764. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
35. Bataille S., Landrier J.F., Astier J., Giaime P., Sampol J., Sichez H., Ollier J., Gugliotta J., Serveaux M., Cohen J., et al. The “Dose-Impact” Relationship Between 25-Hydroxyvitamin D and Muscle Energy in Hemodialysis Sufferers Favors a Regular Threshold of 30 ng/mL for Plasma 25-Hydroxyvitamin D. J. Ren. Nutr. 2016;26:45–52. doi: 10.1053/j.jrn.2015.08.007. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
36. Boudville N., Inderjeeth C., Elder G.J., Glendenning P. Affiliation between 25-hydroxyvitamin D, somatic muscle weak point and falls threat in end-stage renal failure. Clin. Endocrinol. 2010;73:299–304. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2010.03821.x. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
37. Ahmadi F., Damghani S., Lessan-Pezeshki M., Razeghi E., Maziar S., Mahdavi-Mazdeh M. Affiliation of low vitamin D ranges with metabolic syndrome in hemodialysis sufferers. Hemodial. Int. 2016;20:261–269. doi: 10.1111/hdi.12316. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
38. Lai S., Coppola B., Dimko M., Galani A., Innico G., Frassetti N., Mariotti A. Vitamin D deficiency, insulin resistance, and ventricular hypertrophy within the early phases of continual kidney illness. Ren. Fail. 2014;36:58–64. doi: 10.3109/0886022X.2013.832308. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
39. Fusaro M., Gallieni M., Rebora P., Rizzo M.A., Luise M.C., Riva H., Bertoli S., Conte F., Stella A., Ondei P. Atrial fibrillation and low vitamin D ranges are related to extreme vascular calcifications in hemodialysis sufferers. J. Nephrol. 2016;29:419–426. doi: 10.1007/s40620-015-0236-7. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
40. Garcia-Canton C., Bosch E., Ramirez A., Gonzalez Y., Auyanet I., Guerra R., Perez M.A., Fernandez E., Toledo A., Lago M. Vascular calcification and 25-hydroxyvitamin D ranges in non-dialysis sufferers with continual kidney illness phases 4 and 5. Nephrol. Dial. Transpl. 2010;26:2250–2256. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfq650. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
41. London G.M., Guerin A.P., Verbeke F.H., Pannier B., Boutouyrie P., Marchais S.J., Metivier F. Mineral Metabolism and Arterial Features in Finish-Stage Renal Illness: Potential Position of 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Deficiency. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2007;18:613–620. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2006060573. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
42. Liu G.L., Pi H.C., Hao L., Li D.D., Wu Y.G., Dong J. Vitamin D Standing Is an Unbiased Danger Issue for International Cognitive Impairment in Peritoneal Dialysis Sufferers. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0143782. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143782. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
43. Ravani P., Malberti F., Tripepi G., Pecchini P., Cutrupi S., Pizzini P., Cutrupi S., Pizzini P., Mallamaci F., Zoccali C. Vitamin D ranges and affected person consequence in continual kidney illness. Kidney Int. 2009;75:88–95. doi: 10.1038/ki.2008.501. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
44. Pilz S., Iodice S., Zittermann A., Grant W.B., Gandini S. Vitamin D standing and mortality threat in CKD: A meta-analysis of potential research. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2011;58:374–382. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.03.020. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
45. Jean G., Lataillade D., Genet L., Legrand E., Kuentz F., Moreau-Gaudry X., Fouque D. Impression of Hypovitaminosis D and Alfacalcidol Remedy on Survival of Hemodialysis Sufferers: Outcomes from the French ARNOS Research. Nephron Clin. Pract. 2010;118:c204–c210. doi: 10.1159/000321507. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
46. Obi Y., Hamano T., Ichimaru N., Tomida Okay., Matsui I., Fujii N., Okumi M., Kaimori J.Y., Yazawa Okay., Kokado Y., et al. Vitamin D deficiency predicts decline in kidney allograft operate: A potential cohort research. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2014;99:527–535. doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-2421. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
47. Bienaime F., Girard D., Anglicheau D., Canaud G., Souberbielle J.C., Kreis H., Noel L.H., Friedlander G., Elie C., Legendre C., et al. Vitamin D standing and outcomes after renal transplantation. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2013;24:831–841. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2012060614. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
49. Hu M.C., Shi M., Zhang J., Quinones H., Kuro-o M., Moe O.W. Klotho deficiency is an early biomarker of renal ischemia-reperfusion damage and its alternative is protecting. Kidney Int. 2010;78:1240–1251. doi: 10.1038/ki.2010.328. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
50. Hu M.C., Shi M., Zhang J., Quinones H., Griffith C., Kuro-o M., Moe O.W. Klotho deficiency causes vascular calcification in continual kidney illness. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2011;22:124–136. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2009121311. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
51. Li Y.C. Renoprotective results of vitamin D analogs. Kidney Int. 2010;78:134–139. doi: 10.1038/ki.2009.175. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
52. Andrukhova O., Slavic S., Zeitz U., Riesen S.C., Heppelmann M.S., Ambrisko T.D., Markovic M., Kuebler W.M., Erben R.G. Vitamin D is a regulator of endothelial nitric oxide synthase and arterial stiffness in mice. Mol. Endocrinol. 2014;28:53–64. doi: 10.1210/me.2013-1252. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
53. Namir Y., Cohen M.J., Haviv Y.S., Slotki I., Shavit L. Vitamin D ranges, vitamin D supplementation, and prognosis in sufferers with continual kidney illness. Clin. Nephrol. 2016;86:165–174. doi: 10.5414/CN108796. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
54. Kendrick J., Cheung A.Okay., Kaufman J.S., Greene T., Roberts W.L., Smits G., Chonchol M. Associations of plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D concentrations with demise and development to upkeep dialysis in sufferers with superior kidney illness. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2012;60:567–575. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2012.04.014. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
55. Nakano C., Hamano T., Fujii N., Obi Y., Matsui I., Tomida Okay., Mikami S., Inoue Okay., Shimomura A., Nagasawa Y., et al. Intact fibroblast development issue 23 ranges predict incident cardiovascular occasion earlier than however not after the beginning of dialysis. Bone. 2012;50:1266–1274. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2012.02.634. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
56. Massart A., Debelle F.D., Racape J., Gervy C., Husson C., Dhaene M., Wissing Okay.M., Nortier J.L. Biochemical parameters after cholecalciferol repletion in hemodialysis: Outcomes From the VitaDial randomized trial. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2014;64:696–705. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.04.020. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
57. Ish-Shalom S., Segal E., Salganik T., Raz B., Bromberg I.L., Vieth R. Comparability of day by day, weekly, and month-to-month vitamin D3 in ethanol dosing protocols for 2 months in aged hip fracture sufferers. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2008;93:3430–3435. doi: 10.1210/jc.2008-0241. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
58. Mager D.R., Jackson S.T., Hoffmann M.R., Jindal Okay., Senior P.A. Vitamin D3 supplementation, bone well being and high quality of life in adults with diabetes and continual kidney illness: Outcomes of an open label randomized medical trial. Clin. Nutr. 2016 doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2016.05.012. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
59. Jean G., Souberbielle J.C., Chazot C. Month-to-month cholecalciferol administration in haemodialysis sufferers: A easy and environment friendly technique for vitamin D supplementation. Nephrol. Dial. Transpl. 2009;24:3799–3805. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfp370. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
60. Zitt E., Sprenger-Mahr H., Mundle M., Lhotta Okay. Efficacy and security of physique weight-adapted oral cholecalciferol substitution in dialysis sufferers with vitamin D deficiency. BMC Nephrol. 2015;16:128. doi: 10.1186/s12882-015-0116-3. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
61. Delanaye P., Cavalier E., Fafin C., Dubois B.E., Krzesinski J.M., Moranne O. Effectivity of supply noticed remedy in hemodialysis sufferers: The instance of the native vitamin D remedy. J. Nephrol. 2016;29:99–103. doi: 10.1007/s40620-015-0196-y. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
62. Barros X., Rodriguez N.Y., Fuster D., Rodas L., Esforzado N., Mazza A., Rubello D., Campos F., Tapias A., Torregrosa J.V. Comparability of two totally different vitamin D supplementation regimens with oral calcifediol in kidney transplant sufferers. J. Nephrol. 2016;29:703–709. doi: 10.1007/s40620-015-0237-6. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
63. Delanaye P., Weekers L., Warling X., Moonen M., Smelten N., Medart L., Krzesinski J.M., Cavalier E. Cholecalciferol in haemodialysis sufferers: A randomized, double-blind, proof-of-concept and security research. Nephrol. Dial. Transpl. 2013;28:1779–1786. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gft001. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
64. Tokmak F., Quack I., Schieren G., Sellin L., Rattensperger D., Holland-Letz T., Weiner S.M., Rump L.C. Excessive-dose cholecalciferol to right vitamin D deficiency in haemodialysis sufferers. Nephrol. Dial. Transpl. 2008;23:4016–4020. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfn367. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
65. Courbebaisse M., Thervet E., Souberbielle J.C., Zuber J., Eladari D., Martinez F., Mamzer-Bruneel M.F., Urena P., Legendre C., Friedlander G., et al. Results of vitamin D supplementation on the calcium-phosphate stability in renal transplant sufferers. Kidney Int. 2009;75:646–651. doi: 10.1038/ki.2008.549. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
66. Martineau A.R., Jolliffe D.A., Hooper R.L., Greenberg L., Aloia J.F., Bergman P., Dubnov-Raz G., Esposito S., Ganmaa D., Ginde A.A., et al. Vitamin D supplementation to forestall acute respiratory tract infections: Systematic evaluation and meta-analysis of particular person participant information. BMJ. 2017;356:i6583. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i6583. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
67. Hollis B.W., Wagner C.L. Scientific evaluation: The position of the mum or dad compound vitamin D with respect to metabolism and performance: Why medical dose intervals can have an effect on medical outcomes. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2013;98:4619–4628. doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-2653. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
68. Vieth R. optimize vitamin D supplementation to forestall most cancers, based mostly on mobile adaptation and hydroxylase enzymology. Anticancer Res. 2009;29:3675–3684. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
69. Bischoff-Ferrari H.A., Dawson-Hughes B., Staehelin H.B., Orav J.E., Caught A.E., Theiler R., et al. Fall prevention with supplemental and energetic types of vitamin D: A meta-analysis of randomised managed trials. BMJ. 2009;339:b3692. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b3692. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
70. Bischoff-Ferrari H.A., Willett W.C., Orav E.J., Lips P., Meunier P.J., Lyons R.A., Flicker L., Wark J., Jackson R.D., Cauley J.A., et al. A pooled evaluation of vitamin D dose necessities for fracture prevention. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012;367:40–49. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1109617. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
71. Sanders Okay.M., Stuart A.L., Williamson E.J., Simpson J.A., Kotowicz M.A., Younger D., Nicholson G.C. Annual high-dose oral vitamin D and falls and fractures in older girls: A randomized managed trial. JAMA. 2010;303:1815–1822. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.594. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
72. Bischoff-Ferrari H.A., Dawson-Hughes B., Orav E.J., Staehelin H.B., Meyer O.W., Theiler R., Dick W., Willett W.C., Egli A. Month-to-month Excessive-Dose Vitamin D Therapy for the Prevention of Practical Decline: A Randomized Scientific Trial. JAMA Intern. Med. 2016;176:175–183. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.7148. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
73. Bischoff-Ferrari H.A., Dawson-Hughes B., Platz A., Orav E.J., Stahelin H.B., Willett W.C., Can U., Egli A., Mueller N.J., Looser S., et al. Impact of high-dosage cholecalciferol and prolonged physiotherapy on problems after hip fracture: A randomized managed trial. Arch. Intern. Med. 2010;170:813–820. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.67. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
74. Kandula P., Dobre M., Schold J.D., Schreiber M.J., Jr., Mehrotra R., Navaneethan S.D. Vitamin D supplementation in continual kidney illness: A scientific evaluation and meta-analysis of observational research and randomized managed trials. Clin J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2011;6:50–62. doi: 10.2215/CJN.03940510. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
75. Alvarez J.A., Regulation J., Coakley Okay.E., Zughaier S.M., Hao L., Shahid Salles Okay., Wasse H., Gutierrez O.M., Ziegler T.R., Tangpricha V. Excessive-dose cholecalciferol reduces parathyroid hormone in sufferers with early continual kidney illness: A pilot, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2012;96:672–679. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.112.040642. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
76. Cupisti A., Vigo V., Baronti M.E., D’Alessandro C., Ghiadoni L., Egidi M.F. Vitamin D standing and cholecalciferol supplementation in continual kidney illness sufferers: An Italian cohort report. Int. J. Nephrol. Renovasc. Dis. 2015;8:151–157. doi: 10.2147/IJNRD.S90968. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
77. Jean G., Vanel T., Terrat J.C., Chazot C. Prevention of secondary hyperparathyroidism in hemodialysis sufferers: The important thing position of native vitamin D supplementation. Hemodial. Int. 2010;14:486–491. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-4758.2010.00472.x. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
78. Sprague S.M., Silva A.L., Al-Saghir F., Damle R., Tabash S.P., Petkovich M., Messner E.J., White J.A., Melnick J.Z., Bishop C.W. Modified-release calcifediol successfully controls secondary hyperparathyroidism related to vitamin D insufficiency in continual kidney illness. Am J. Nephrol. 2014;40:535–545. doi: 10.1159/000369939. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
79. Bhan I., Dobens D., Tamez H., Deferio J.J., Li Y.C., Warren H.S., Ankers E., Wenger J., Tucker J.Okay., Trottier C., et al. Dietary vitamin D supplementation in dialysis: A randomized trial. Clin J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2015;10:611–619. doi: 10.2215/CJN.06910714. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
80. Tangpricha V., Wasse H. Vitamin D remedy in kidney illness: Extra vitamin D is important. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2014;64:667–669. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.08.004. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
81. Seibert E., Heine G.H., Ulrich C., Seiler S., Kohler H., Girndt M. Affect of cholecalciferol supplementation in hemodialysis sufferers on monocyte subsets: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled medical trial. Nephron Clin. Pract. 2013;123:209–219. doi: 10.1159/000354717. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
82. Kim M.J., Frankel A.H., Donaldson M., Darch S.J., Pusey C.D., Hill P.D., Mayr M., Tam F.W. Oral cholecalciferol decreases albuminuria and urinary TGF-β1 in sufferers with kind 2 diabetic nephropathy on established renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibition. Kidney Int. 2011;80:851–860. doi: 10.1038/ki.2011.224. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
83. Aytac M.B., Deveci M., Bek Okay., Kayabey O., Ekinci Z. Impact of cholecalciferol on native arterial stiffness and endothelial dysfunction in kids with continual kidney illness. Pediatr. Nephrol. 2016;31:267–277. doi: 10.1007/s00467-015-3220-5. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
84. Meireles M.S., Kamimura M.A., Dalboni M.A., Giffoni de Carvalho J.T., Aoike D.T., Cuppari L. Impact of cholecalciferol on vitamin D-regulatory proteins in monocytes and on inflammatory markers in dialysis sufferers: A randomized managed trial. Clin. Nutr. 2016;35:1251–1258. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2016.04.014. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
85. Karakas Y., Sahin G., Urfali F.E., Bal C., Degirmenci N.A., Sirmagul B. Impact of vitamin D supplementation on endothelial dysfunction in hemodialysis sufferers. Hemodial. Int. 2017;21:97–106. doi: 10.1111/hdi.12439. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
86. Mann M.C., Hobbs A.J., Hemmelgarn B.R., Roberts D.J., Ahmed S.B., Rabi D.M. Impact of oral vitamin D analogs on mortality and cardiovascular outcomes amongst adults with continual kidney illness: A meta-analysis. Clin. Kidney J. 2015;8:41–48. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfu122. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
87. Levin G.P., Robinson-Cohen C., de Boer I.H., Houston D.Okay., Lohman Okay., Liu Y., Kritchevsky S.B., Cauley J.A., Tanaka T., Ferrucci L., et al. Genetic variants and associations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations with main medical outcomes. JAMA. 2012;308:1898–1905. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.17304. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
88. Vieth R. The mechanisms of vitamin D toxicity. Bone Miner. 1990;11:267–272. doi: 10.1016/0169-6009(90)90023-9. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
89. Vieth R. Vitamin D supplementation, 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations, and security. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1999;69:842–856. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
90. Jacobus C.H., Holick M.F., Shao Q., Chen T.C., Holm I.A., Kolodny J.M., Fuleihan G.E., Seely E.W. Hypervitaminosis D related to consuming milk. N. Engl. J. Med. 1992;326:1173–1177. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199204303261801. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
91. Cavalier E., Wallace A.M., Knox S., Mistretta V.I., Cormier C., Souberbielle J.C. Serum vitamin D measurement might not mirror what you give to your sufferers. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2008;23:1864–1865. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.080608. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
92. Armas L.A., Hollis B.W., Heaney R.P. Vitamin D2 is far much less efficient than vitamin D3 in people. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2004;89:5387–5391. doi: 10.1210/jc.2004-0360. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
93. Holick M.F., Biancuzzo R.M., Chen T.C., Klein E.Okay., Younger A., Bibuld D., Reitz R., Salameh W., Ameri A., Tannenbaum A.D. Vitamin D2 is as efficient as vitamin D3 in sustaining circulating concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D. J. Clini. Endocrinol. Metab. 2008;93:677–681. doi: 10.1210/jc.2007-2308. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
94. Oliveri B., Mastaglia S.R., Brito G.M., Seijo M., Keller G.A., Somoza J., Diez R.A., Di Girolamo G. Vitamin D3 appears extra applicable than D2 to maintain enough ranges of 25OHD: A pharmacokinetic strategy. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2015;69:697–702. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2015.16. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
95. Wetmore J.B., Kimber C., Mahnken J.D., Stubbs J.R. Cholecalciferol v. ergocalciferol for 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) repletion in continual kidney illness: A randomised medical trial. Br. J. Nutr. 2016;116:2074–2081. doi: 10.1017/S000711451600427X. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
96. Lehmann U., Hirche F., Stangl G.I., Hinz Okay., Westphal S., Dierkes J. Bioavailability of vitamin D(2) and D(3) in wholesome volunteers, a randomized placebo-controlled trial. J. Clini. Endocrinol. Metab. 2013;98:4339–4345. doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-4287. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
97. Berl T., Berns A.S., Hufer W.E., Hammill Okay., Alfrey A.C., Arnaud C.D., et al. 1,25 dihydroxycholecalciferol results in continual dialysis. A double-blind managed research. Ann. Intern. Med. 1978;88:774–780. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-88-6-774. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
98. Lessard M., Ouimet D., Leblanc M., Nadeau-Fredette A.C., Bell R., Lafrance J.P., Schrier R.W. Comparability of oral and intravenous alfacalcidol in continual hemodialysis sufferers. BMC Nephrol. 2014;15:27. doi: 10.1186/1471-2369-15-27. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
99. Urena P., Jacobson S.H., Zitt E., Vervloet M., Malberti F., Ashman N., Leavey S., Rix M., Os I., Saha H., et al. Cinacalcet and achievement of the NKF/Okay-DOQITM beneficial goal values for bone and mineral metabolism in real-world medical follow—the ECHO observational research. Nephrol. Dial. Transpl. 2009;24:2852–2859. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfp144. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
100. Kalantar-Zadeh Okay., Kuwae N., Regidor D.L., Kovesdy C.P., Kilpatrick R.D., Shinaberger C.S., McAllister C.J., Budoff M.J., Salusky I.B., Kopple J.D. Survival predictability of time-varying indicators of bone illness in upkeep hemodialysis sufferers. Kidney Int. 2006;70:771–780. doi: 10.1038/ [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
101. Melamed M.L., Eustace J.A., Plantinga L., Jaar B.G., Fink N.E., Coresh J., Klag M.J., Powe N.R. Adjustments in serum calcium, phosphate, and PTH and the danger of demise in incident dialysis sufferers: A longitudinal research. Kidney Int. 2006;70:351–357. doi: 10.1038/ [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
102. Teng M., Wolf M., Lowrie E., Ofsthun N., Lazarus J.M., Thadhani R. Survival of sufferers present process hemodialysis with paricalcitol or calcitriol remedy. N. Engl. J. Med. 2003;349:446–456. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa022536. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
103. Tentori F., Hunt W.C., Stidley C.A., Rohrscheib M.R., Bedrick E.J., Meyer Okay.B., Johnson H.Okay., Zager P.G. Mortality threat amongst hemodialysis sufferers receiving totally different vitamin D analogs. Kidney Int. 2006;70:1858–1865. doi: 10.1038/ [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
104. Zheng Z., Shi H., Jia J., Li D., Lin S. Vitamin D supplementation and mortality threat in continual kidney illness: A meta-analysis of 20 observational research. BMC Nephrol. 2013;25:199. doi: 10.1186/1471-2369-14-199. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
105. Shoji T., Shinohara Okay., Kimoto E., Emoto M., Tahara H., Koyama H., Inaba M., Fukumoto S., Ishimura E., Miki T. Decrease threat for cardiovascular mortality in oral 1alpha-hydroxy vitamin D3 customers in a haemodialysis inhabitants. Nephrol. Dial. Transpl. 2004;19:179–184. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfg513. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
106. Tanaka S., Ninomiya T., Taniguchi M., Fujisaki Okay., Tokumoto M., Hirakata H., Ooboshi H., Kitazono T., Tsuruya Okay. Comparability of oral versus intravenous vitamin D receptor activator in decreasing infection-related mortality in hemodialysis sufferers: The Q-Cohort Research. Nephrol. Dial. Transpl. 2016;31:1152–1160. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfw205. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
107. Li X.H., Feng L., Yang Z.H., Liao Y.H. The Impact of Lively Vitamin D on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Predialysis Continual Kidney Illnesses: A Systematic Evaluate and Meta-Evaluation. Nephrology. 2015;20:706–714. doi: 10.1111/nep.12505. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
108. Inaguma D., Tanaka A., Shinjo H., Kato A., Murata M. Predialysis Vitamin D Receptor Activator Therapy and Cardiovascular Occasions after Dialysis Initiation: A Multicenter Observational Research. Nephron. 2016;133:35–43. doi: 10.1159/000445507. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
109. Hansen D., Rasmussen Okay., Danielsen H., Meyer-Hofmann H., Bacevicius E., Lauridsen T.G., Madsen J.Okay., Tougaard B.G., Marckmann P., Thye-Roenn P., et al. No distinction between alfacalcidol and paricalcitol within the remedy of secondary hyperparathyroidism in hemodialysis sufferers: A randomized crossover trial. Kidney Int. 2011;80:841–850. doi: 10.1038/ki.2011.226. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
110. Dusilova-Sulkova S., Safranek R., Vavrova J., Horacek J., Pavlikova L., Palicka V. Low-dose cholecalciferol supplementation and twin vitamin D remedy in haemodialysis sufferers. Int. Urol. Nephrol. 2015;47:169–176. doi: 10.1007/s11255-014-0842-7. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
111. Lou Y.R., Molnar F., Perakyla M., Qiao S., Kalueff A.V., St-Arnaud R., Carlberg C., Tuohimaa P. 25-Hydroxyvitamin D(3) is an agonistic vitamin D receptor ligand. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2010;118:162–170. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2009.11.011. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
112. Arcidiacono M.V., Yang J., Fernandez E., Dusso A. The induction of C/EBPβ contributes to vitamin D inhibition of ADAM17 expression and parathyroid hyperplasia in kidney illness. Nephrol. Dial. Transpl. 2015;30:423–433. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfu311. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
113. Agarwal R., Georgianos P.I. Con: Dietary vitamin D alternative in continual kidney illness and end-stage renal illness. Nephrol. Dial. Transpl. 2016;31:706–713. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfw080. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
114. Zoccali C., Mallamaci F. Moderator’s view: Vitamin D deficiency remedy in superior continual kidney illness: A detailed take a look at the emperor’s garments. Nephrol. Dial. Transpl. 2016;31:714–716. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfw081. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *